| Back to "beta" maps. Show all maps.
Last update for (2)Twilight For TwoX : 2008, 08, 29 22:38
| mapID | Mapname (comments) | map size | Author | Rating | Type | play type | | 3215 |  (2)Twilight For TwoX | 128*96 | Rutegar | 2.2 | beta | ground |
The map has been rated 25 times and got a total of 55 points |
<<>>
You can rate the map here. Chose a grade between 10 (best) and 0 (worst).
| rutegar | | | This is a two player twilight map. If you have any comments or suggestions for me to improve it, they'd be greatly appreciated. If you want to take it and remake it into something really awesome, by all means do.
The "X" after the title means that if played in UMS, the entire map is revealed then un-revealed in order to show both players the map layout (making memorization of the map unnecessary). The mains, of course, are not revealed. | | jeb | | | The minimized image of the map looks cool, which is always a plus. However, the mains feel somewhat awkwardly shaped... I don't have any concrete suggestions, though.
One obvious thing you could fix is the gas issue. Move the main minerals to the left/right (so they are facing the opponent's main), and place the gas in a 12 o'clock position. | | Rutegar | | | | Thanks, I hadn't read the "gas issue" article. From what I can tell, it doesn't seem that mappers move the geysers to the optimal position on expansions too. I'll just re-do the mains for now. | | Rutegar | | | | Do you guys think the map is too open? Should the central high-ground area not have such large ramps facing upwards? Is the name too unoriginal and dull? I bet there's a ton of things I can change to make the map better. Any suggestions at all? |
| Replays
Upload replay for this map |
Add your comment:
Because of heavy spam on the map comments, it is needed to be logged in to post. We are sorry that this has to be done because nothing else stops spam bots
|  |
Twilight For Two.jpg)
