| Back to "beta" maps. Show all maps.
Last update for (4)Deroutement : 2012, 03, 24 03:30
| mapID | Mapname (comments) | map size | Author | Rating | Type | play type | | 4478 |  (4)Deroutement | 128*128 | ArcTimes | 2.4 | beta | ground |
The map has been rated 8 times and got a total of 19 points |
<<>>
You can rate the map here. Chose a grade between 10 (best) and 0 (worst).
| Freakling | | | Crystal?
Looks unplayable. | | ArcTimes | | | I'M BACK!!!
D:!! Unplayable?
Well, definetly is difficult to play but... i think you can play on it :D
First i tried to make just one nat with double path, but it was f***ing imba. A terran would rape you with the first attack. It didn't matter what, an fd, an strong fd, a drop, or even siege expand lol.
But then i changed so there are "2 nats" but you can choose the path. You can scout normally using the mineral (that also helps the terran walling of the 2 ramps) and the geyser.
Regards, i hope you like it D:!! really.
EDIT: I noticed that the mineral in the base in 2 doesn't help walling in the 2 ramps, i fixed that.
modified by ArcTimes | | ArcTimes | | | | Come on guys, comment D: | | Freakling | | | | Your comment | | ArcTimes | | | -_-
| | CrystalDrag | | | Just cause buildings doesnt make mine :o
Honestly it doesnt look that playable. o.o
python
making it 4 player makes it really hard to have weird nat. | | ArcTimes | | | | The idea was that depending in what nat a player choose, the path distance is different. It can be really short and really large. | | sTY_leZerG-eX | | | | I kinda like this but it looks weird |
| Replays
Upload replay for this map |
Add your comment:
Because of heavy spam on the map comments, it is needed to be logged in to post. We are sorry that this has to be done because nothing else stops spam bots
|  |
