| BWMN Time |
| 01/12/2026 |
| 18:44 |
| News |
| new account |
| list users |
| Login: |
| Replays |
| Map DB |
| ICCup |
| Map Access |
| New map |
| Edit map |
 |
Forum - main
New Map page: 1 | ||
| Im currently making a new map called (2)Kel-Morian Combine... one problem... i have 3 versions of it so take alook at them wen i post the pics up personally i like the first. but it doesnt mean i wont change it a bit modified by NastyMarine modified by NastyMarine | ||
| 2006, 03, 07 00:16 | ||
 | ||
| 2006, 03, 07 00:17 | ||
 | ||
| 2006, 03, 07 00:18 | ||
 | ||
| 2006, 03, 07 00:19 | ||
| I've been putting in my two cents, and I prefer the third, just because I don't want T to own those tight corridors with turrets, so rocky ground is nice. | ||
| 2006, 03, 07 00:59 | ||
| 3 Looks very promising. | ||
| 2006, 03, 07 02:10 | ||
| ok, i wrote a long comment and hit the "back" button on my mouse, anyway, here is the short version: DONT EVER USE MINERALPATCHES AS DECORATION! NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER EVER! NEVER! | ||
| 2006, 03, 07 03:16 | ||
| 2, I kinda like the mineral pathces for decoration thing you got going there, (although alot of it would just get anoying, but a map with it every here and there is kinda cool). The only diference I see between 2 and 3 is the terrain in the grass, and two looks better, so I might be missing something else =P. | ||
| 2006, 03, 07 03:34 | ||
| lol yeah i kno it screws wit the mini map but kel-morian (story wise) is the richest place in the sc universe .. mineral patches everywhere so i jus wanted to incorporate that into the map! u gotta admit it does look a bit sexy | ||
| 2006, 03, 07 03:34 | ||
| yeah i sed the same thing about the looks to epidion earlier but he sed that 3 was the best. but i still love my original plan (first pic) but i dont like the middle.. go figure .. im all over the place with it | ||
| 2006, 03, 07 03:36 | ||
| The rocky ground doesn't look as good, true, but it doesn't let Terran completely dominate the small corridors. I mean, look at Kaiber. That's actually where the middle from 2 and 3 came from, and the rocky ground from 3. | ||
| 2006, 03, 07 04:53 | ||
| 1 or 3 three looks more standard, 1 seems to bring some fresh tactics | ||
| 2006, 03, 07 08:51 | ||
| Yeah i feel the same way. just that 1 is a bit tight.. but wat else u think about it? From here on out i was wondering if i can have votes with a simple comment saying why each person likes one over another.. i'd appreciate it. thx | ||
| 2006, 03, 07 08:59 | ||
| Sorry, but i don't like all of them. But from those 3 version the third is the best. | ||
| 2006, 03, 07 08:59 | ||
| really? damn i was thinkin that this wuld *catch* everyone's eye in a good way. proved me wrong! lol.. nething i should change in 3 or improve? modified by NastyMarine | ||
| 2006, 03, 07 09:06 | ||
| "DONT EVER USE MINERALPATCHES AS DECORATION! NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER EVER! NEVER!" And that's not all... You have so many maps now in this size and tileset. It's just getting boring. Try something fresh, then it might tuch my eye. | ||
| 2006, 03, 07 09:15 | ||
| im about to go with 3 but i dont like the expos behind the nats in the corners... shuld i make it jus like it is in 1 jus in the corners? i really like that idea.. im about to upload the map but i jus need last minute suggestions | ||
| 2006, 03, 08 19:19 | ||
| page: 1 | ||
Reply:
You have to be logged in to post
 |