| Back to "beta" maps. Show all maps.
Last update for (2)Lava Party beta : 2010, 07, 23 14:45
| mapID | Mapname (comments) | map size | Author | Rating | Type | play type | | 231 |  (2)Lava Party beta | 96*96 | Kabumm | 0.9 | beta | |
The map has been rated 55 times and got a total of 52 points |
<<>>
You can rate the map here. Chose a grade between 10 (best) and 0 (worst).
| Kabumm | | | | It's the second map I made, the first one was rather big, too big ;). I didn't have enough ideas what to do with the space, that's why this one is rather small. It isn't decorated yet, cause it's so frustrating to do it over and over again, when you have to change the terrain. Waiting for your feedback... ;) | | panschk | | | 96*96 btw
U kept it really simple. It looks ok, quite balanced and playable, but nothing special imo. And I dislike ash tileset T_T | | Starparty | | | | too much money for a 96x96... imo, cut all exp from 8 to 6, and do something about that center :P is it like 1 million cash there? :) as for decoration, just make a natural pattern of lava and shell and it should look quite nice. put doodads tastefully at places noone should be using anyway i.e tight spots or the side of the roads etc.. | | Kabumm | | | "do something about that center :P is it like 1 million cash there?"
hehe, almost. let's see 1.500x20=30.000. but i think i won't change the center, it's the most interesting thing about this map IMHO. there's no more room for ressources except the places i chose. and i think you should have at least 3 gas expansions per player, otherwise games will be very short and boring. normally nobody would expand in the center, cause it will always be hard-fouhgt and flanking is easy. maybe it might get a bit unfair in case of a containment situation, but most effective containments are lurker- and tank-containment, and zerg and terran need gas, so it won't be too usefull. i don't know, maybe i'll remove 2 or 4 patches. i appreciate your comment. :D | | Starparty | | | | I think u'd be better off with less cash over all. smaller map, less cash. smaller battles. you dont want to get a passive buildup limit vs limit war on this map, cause the battle will end quickly for the attacking player since there is no ground to hold or gain. simply holding your base is almost securing half of the map. see what i mean? :P | | boongee | | | Yeah, as everyone else has said, this map is pretty simple, but that's what happens when you use anything smaller than 96x128.
And where's the lava? It's called lava party but I don't see any -_- | | LasTCursE | | | | This post is not displayed due to its content | | JungleTerrain | | | | This post is not displayed due to its content | | x-species | | | | what is this shit :D | | Kinosjourney | | | | Look at the map ID, this map is probably 5-6 years old :P |
| Replays
Upload replay for this map |
Add your comment:
Because of heavy spam on the map comments, it is needed to be logged in to post. We are sorry that this has to be done because nothing else stops spam bots
|  |
